The Externalities of the Democratic System

Economics, Politics, Philosophy, History and Culture
Forum rules
Always add something of value to the discussion and have fun. Mind your language, no porn, no libel, no trolling and no personal attacks.

Please note, views expressed on the forum do not necessarily represent the views of Mises UK.
User avatar
Tom Rogers
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 5:55 pm
Location: The Atheistic Pagan Avatars' Own County
Contact:

Re: The Externalities of the Democratic System

Post by Tom Rogers » Fri May 18, 2018 3:54 pm

Merlin wrote:
Fri May 18, 2018 2:28 pm
Tom Rogers wrote:
Fri May 18, 2018 11:50 am
These measures must be coupled with depopulation by means of deporting people who are not of north-western European heritage.
Of course, but homogeneity used to be the norm before mass democracy tolerated the influx of the "new citizens", as it tolerated and tolerates selective law enforcement without which most of this wouldn't have been possible.

And mass democracy itself was ushered in by the limited franchise of yesterday, so what would change this time?
Mass democracy was not the result of the limited franchise, in my view. As explained above, I believe liberty is a precursor to democracy. The problem is that liberal-democratic orthodoxy reverses this, pedestalling democracy, leaving us with a fake democracy and a facsimile of liberty. I think the starting point is land reform, i.e. a redistribution of land, so that people have the opportunity to own their means of living and control their own destinies. If that can be attained, then most people will not care whether they have the right to put a 'X' mark on a piece of paper every few years.

User avatar
Physiocrat
Site Admin
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:25 am

Re: The Externalities of the Democratic System

Post by Physiocrat » Mon May 21, 2018 9:05 am

Merlin wrote:
Fri May 18, 2018 2:28 pm
Tom Rogers wrote:
Fri May 18, 2018 11:50 am
These measures must be coupled with depopulation by means of deporting people who are not of north-western European heritage.
Of course, but homogeneity used to be the norm before mass democracy tolerated the influx of the "new citizens", as it tolerated and tolerates selective law enforcement without which most of this wouldn't have been possible.

And mass democracy itself was ushered in by the limited franchise of yesterday, so what would change this time?
The main difference I would see is that the goal is in the opposite direction. If you view the fall of absolute monarchy to mass democracy as the spirit of equality the movement, a counter movement rather has the spirit of inequality. To work however you would need a cultural zeitgeist also moving in such a direction.
The atoms tell the atoms so, for I never was or will but atoms forevermore be.

Yours sincerely,

Physiocrat

Post Reply